Posts Tagged ‘Alan Solow’

Solow: Obama’s Support for Jewish State ‘Unequivocal’

Tuesday, July 28th, 2009

The other day, I received an email from a Jewish communal leader, forwarding an email from another Jewish communal leader, which stated simply: “The honeymoon is over.”

Attached was an article from American Thinker, a daily conservative web site, headlined: “National Leader Turns Against Obama.”

The national leader in question was Alan Solow, which made the article particularly damning, because Solow is the Jewish Chicagoan who has known Obama for years, and who prominently heckshered Obama as a friend of Israel during the election campaign. With false news articles swirling that Obama was a Muslim with a retinue of anti-Israel advisors, many Jews looked to Solow’s endorsement as evidence that Obama supports Israel — not just in word, but in his kishksas.

Since the election, Solow has been named chair of the Conference of Presidents of Major Jewish Organizations. The American Thinker article was pinned on a statement from Solow and Malcolm Hoenlein, executive vice chair of the Conference of Presidents, taking issue with the Obama administration for opposing a Jewish construction project in East Jerusalem.

The article claimed “a huge crack has surfaced in Obama’s Jewish base in the person of Alan Solow,” noting that Solow’s “rosy expectations of Obama and [chief of staff Rahm] Emanuel as reliable friends of Israel have been dashed.”

When I received the email and read Solow’s statement, it was immediately apparent that the American Thinker article was a wildly exaggerated hatchet job. Solow and Hoenlein had objected to a specific policy. Nowhere in the statement was there evidence of the catastrophic schism suggested by the article.

Indeed, Solow has just come out with his own rebuttal:

The statement we issued on Jerusalem reflected long standing policy of the Conference of Presidents. Given the press attention focused on this issue, we thought it was appropriate to speak out. It was not intended as a general comment on President Obama’s ongoing approach in his current discussions with Israel. One thing the President made clear in our White House discussion of July 13 was that there might be points of disagreement over issues of strategy, but the President also wanted it known that his support for Israel as a Jewish State in the Middle East was unequivocal. The President’s commitment to Israel’s safety and security is one that he has previously stated publicly, as well as privately to me over the years. Our relationship remains excellent, and the President understood when I became Conference Chair that I would advocate for positions based on communal consensus. As Chairman of the Conference, I look forward to working with the President to make his support meaningful and effective, and his hosting of the meeting with Jewish leaders is an indication that he wants to hear from our community. I think all participants in the meeting would agree that it was valuable and productive. I intend to continue to engage with the Administration to advance the interests of American Jewry, and I expect that the President and his team will continue to value our input.

The president’s support for Israel as a Jewish state is unequivocal. Obama is committed to Israel’s safety and security. Our relationship remains excellent

Alan Solow is probably one of the most important Jewish leaders in America right now. He not only trusts Obama, but Obama trusts him.  Perhaps more than any other leader, when Solow speaks out, you can bet Obama will get the message. This was not the first time Solow has offered Obama constructive criticism on Israel, and I hope it won’t be the last.

As for American Thinker, the damage is done. The inflammatory storyline about a fairy tale breach is out there, circulating, taking hold. Don’t expect a retraction any time soon.

Ross: ‘Obama Will Restore American Standing in the World’

Monday, October 13th, 2008

One incredible aspect of the Obama campaign is just how much it has reached out to Jewish voters.

And, in particular, Jewish voters in Ohio.

A week before the primary, Obama came to speak to a group of Jewish voters in Cleveland, to answer any and all questions we had about his positions on Israel, and on issues important to the Jewish community. The Obama campaign has tapped Jewish community leaders throughout the state, entrusting them with spreading the message about Obama’s staunch support for Israel.  They’ve released talking points. And they are constantly sending out emails — for instance, when Obama had a conference call with 900 rabbis — to keep Jewish supporters up-to-date.

They’ve done this not only because Obama is a friend and ally of the Jewish community. They’ve done this because the smear campaign aimed at Obama has been designed to peel away Jewish supporters, and it’s worked: Obama’s support in the Jewish community is 15 to 20 percent below the levels of support that Kerry, Gore, and Clinton received. In a close election, that difference could be determinative.

Yesterday’s event at Landerhaven banquet hall, which drew an enthusiastic crowd of 700 Jews from the Cleveland area, powerfully reinforced the campaign’s Jewish outreach effort.

The event featured Jewish Senator Carl Levin (See post, Levin: Jews ‘Cannot Tolerate’ Obama Smears), Jewish Congresswoman Jane Harman (See post, Obama-Biden: ‘Much Better for Israel’), Jewish community leader and Obama friend Alan Solow (See post, ‘The First Jewish President of the United States’), and, for good measure, the Jewish Lt. Gov. of Ohio, Lee Fischer.

All of them said, unequivocally, not just that Obama is good for Israel and the Jews — but that he is far betterfor Israel and the Jews than McCain-Palin.

Perhaps the most important testimonial came from Ambassador Dennis Ross, if only because Obama has for so long been falsely smeared for his supposed anti-Israel advisors. Ross is, in fact, Sen. Obama’s senior Middle East advisor. He’s the guy for Obama on Israel.

Dennis Ross, the former U.S. Special Coordinator to the Middle East, was the U.S. point person for negotiations between Israel and the Palestinians under both Bill Clinton and the first George Bush. He helped Israel and the Palestinians reach the interim agreement on the West Bank and Gaza Strip in 1995; he brokered the Hebron accord in 1997, facilitated the Israeli-Jordanian peace treaty, and worked on talks between Israel and Syria. He was the director of Near East and South Asian Affairs on the National Security Council staff under Ronald Reagan, and was director of the State Department’s Policy Planning office under George Bush.

All of which is to say, he is anything but a partisan hack.

And yet this election, for the first time, he has allied himself with a candidate — Obama – because, as he put it, “the stakes demand it.”

He connected several dots in the Middle East landscape, creating a bleak picture how how dire the situation has become for Israel since Bush came to power.

  • In 2001, Iran was not a nuclear nation; today, it is a nuclear power that continues to enrich uranium, with a stockpile of some 700 kilos — half of what it needs to make a nuclear bomb.
  • To Israel’s north, the terrorist group Hezbollah has veto power over the Lebanese government; Hezbollah has a stockpile of 40,000 rockets aimed at Israel.
  • To Israel’s south, Hamas has established a “mini-terrorist state,” with 2,000 rockets aimed at Israel.

“Why?” Ross asked. ”Because for the last eight years, we sat on the sidelines. Everything that takes place now, takes place without us.”

“The Bush Administration has failed,” he said. “We are perceived as a country on the decline.”

“When the Bush Administration disengaged from peacemaking for six years, who was the beneficiary? When there is no sense of possibility, no hope [the terrorist organizations and states] are the ones that exploit it.”

In order to achieve the two state solution that successive U.S. administrations have touted, you “need a sense of possibility,” he said. Otherwise, “we are guaranteed to fail” because the terrorist groups will step in to fill the political vacuum.

Ross, who has been on some 20 presidential trips to the region, and sat in on a hundred negotiations with presidents or their counterparts, said he “knows what it takes” for presidents to be effective. Obama has what it takes, he said. Ross became convinced of this after accompanying Obama on his recent trip to Israel and watching him listen, connect, and, importantly, achieve concrete goals.

For example, he said, Obama was keenly interested in discussing ways to pressure Iran. He asked Israeli leaders for their ideas. Israelis told him that there are five insurance companies providing insurance to Iran. Cut off those companies, they said, and you start to generate immense economic pressure.

Obama took that idea and pitched it to the Europeans, who are now actively discussing it.

Ross said Obama’s position that the U.S. must use “strong carrots and strong sticks” with Iran is key, because ideally “you want to effect Iranian behavior without the use of force.” The Israelis would much prefer this, too, he said. The cost to Israel of any attack on Iran would be profound in blood and treasure. But you can’t use carrots effectively without persuading others to join the effort.

That’s why, he said, the way Obama has been received around the world — 200,000 people cheering him on the streets of Berlin, for instance – is totally germane to Israel’s security.

“I came back persuaded by Barack Obama because I saw someone who is a unique talent,” said Ross — who initially stayed neutral in the race between Clinton and Obama. “When he goes to Berlin, and 200,000 people cheer him, believe it or not — when others look up to an American president, and are inspired by an American president — we are better off.”

As Ross wound down, you could almost sense a kind of energy in the room, quietly building.

“Barack Obama will restore American standing in the world,” he said. “We don’t have the luxury of not having him as president. I can tell you, as someone passionately committed to the state of Israel, Israel can not afford it.”

I’d been to Landerhaven banquet hall several times. My wife and I had, six years ago, scouted this very room as a possible wedding site. I doubt the room has ever seen the kind of applause that followed.

It wasn’t a standing ovation. It was something else. It rose up – 700 people, an overflow crowd – well past the point when you’d expect it to die down. It hung on, loud, tenacious, like the last notes of Bruce Springsteen’s Born to Run. And then, finally, it ebbed, slightly — only to rise back up again, with shouts behind it, more forceful, insistent.

It was at once a release, an endorsement, and a prayer, and it brought sudden tears to my eyes.

If there was any lingering hesitation — any doubts in the face of viral emails and horrible ads by Jewish Republicans and relentless smears that just keep coming — in that moment, it all seemed to wash away.

The message to Barack Obama was clear:

Win. Win!