Posts Tagged ‘Carl Levin’

Ross: ‘Obama Will Restore American Standing in the World’

Monday, October 13th, 2008

One incredible aspect of the Obama campaign is just how much it has reached out to Jewish voters.

And, in particular, Jewish voters in Ohio.

A week before the primary, Obama came to speak to a group of Jewish voters in Cleveland, to answer any and all questions we had about his positions on Israel, and on issues important to the Jewish community. The Obama campaign has tapped Jewish community leaders throughout the state, entrusting them with spreading the message about Obama’s staunch support for Israel.  They’ve released talking points. And they are constantly sending out emails — for instance, when Obama had a conference call with 900 rabbis — to keep Jewish supporters up-to-date.

They’ve done this not only because Obama is a friend and ally of the Jewish community. They’ve done this because the smear campaign aimed at Obama has been designed to peel away Jewish supporters, and it’s worked: Obama’s support in the Jewish community is 15 to 20 percent below the levels of support that Kerry, Gore, and Clinton received. In a close election, that difference could be determinative.

Yesterday’s event at Landerhaven banquet hall, which drew an enthusiastic crowd of 700 Jews from the Cleveland area, powerfully reinforced the campaign’s Jewish outreach effort.

The event featured Jewish Senator Carl Levin (See post, Levin: Jews ‘Cannot Tolerate’ Obama Smears), Jewish Congresswoman Jane Harman (See post, Obama-Biden: ‘Much Better for Israel’), Jewish community leader and Obama friend Alan Solow (See post, ‘The First Jewish President of the United States’), and, for good measure, the Jewish Lt. Gov. of Ohio, Lee Fischer.

All of them said, unequivocally, not just that Obama is good for Israel and the Jews — but that he is far betterfor Israel and the Jews than McCain-Palin.

Perhaps the most important testimonial came from Ambassador Dennis Ross, if only because Obama has for so long been falsely smeared for his supposed anti-Israel advisors. Ross is, in fact, Sen. Obama’s senior Middle East advisor. He’s the guy for Obama on Israel.

Dennis Ross, the former U.S. Special Coordinator to the Middle East, was the U.S. point person for negotiations between Israel and the Palestinians under both Bill Clinton and the first George Bush. He helped Israel and the Palestinians reach the interim agreement on the West Bank and Gaza Strip in 1995; he brokered the Hebron accord in 1997, facilitated the Israeli-Jordanian peace treaty, and worked on talks between Israel and Syria. He was the director of Near East and South Asian Affairs on the National Security Council staff under Ronald Reagan, and was director of the State Department’s Policy Planning office under George Bush.

All of which is to say, he is anything but a partisan hack.

And yet this election, for the first time, he has allied himself with a candidate — Obama – because, as he put it, “the stakes demand it.”

He connected several dots in the Middle East landscape, creating a bleak picture how how dire the situation has become for Israel since Bush came to power.

  • In 2001, Iran was not a nuclear nation; today, it is a nuclear power that continues to enrich uranium, with a stockpile of some 700 kilos — half of what it needs to make a nuclear bomb.
  • To Israel’s north, the terrorist group Hezbollah has veto power over the Lebanese government; Hezbollah has a stockpile of 40,000 rockets aimed at Israel.
  • To Israel’s south, Hamas has established a “mini-terrorist state,” with 2,000 rockets aimed at Israel.

“Why?” Ross asked. ”Because for the last eight years, we sat on the sidelines. Everything that takes place now, takes place without us.”

“The Bush Administration has failed,” he said. “We are perceived as a country on the decline.”

“When the Bush Administration disengaged from peacemaking for six years, who was the beneficiary? When there is no sense of possibility, no hope [the terrorist organizations and states] are the ones that exploit it.”

In order to achieve the two state solution that successive U.S. administrations have touted, you “need a sense of possibility,” he said. Otherwise, “we are guaranteed to fail” because the terrorist groups will step in to fill the political vacuum.

Ross, who has been on some 20 presidential trips to the region, and sat in on a hundred negotiations with presidents or their counterparts, said he “knows what it takes” for presidents to be effective. Obama has what it takes, he said. Ross became convinced of this after accompanying Obama on his recent trip to Israel and watching him listen, connect, and, importantly, achieve concrete goals.

For example, he said, Obama was keenly interested in discussing ways to pressure Iran. He asked Israeli leaders for their ideas. Israelis told him that there are five insurance companies providing insurance to Iran. Cut off those companies, they said, and you start to generate immense economic pressure.

Obama took that idea and pitched it to the Europeans, who are now actively discussing it.

Ross said Obama’s position that the U.S. must use “strong carrots and strong sticks” with Iran is key, because ideally “you want to effect Iranian behavior without the use of force.” The Israelis would much prefer this, too, he said. The cost to Israel of any attack on Iran would be profound in blood and treasure. But you can’t use carrots effectively without persuading others to join the effort.

That’s why, he said, the way Obama has been received around the world — 200,000 people cheering him on the streets of Berlin, for instance – is totally germane to Israel’s security.

“I came back persuaded by Barack Obama because I saw someone who is a unique talent,” said Ross — who initially stayed neutral in the race between Clinton and Obama. “When he goes to Berlin, and 200,000 people cheer him, believe it or not — when others look up to an American president, and are inspired by an American president — we are better off.”

As Ross wound down, you could almost sense a kind of energy in the room, quietly building.

“Barack Obama will restore American standing in the world,” he said. “We don’t have the luxury of not having him as president. I can tell you, as someone passionately committed to the state of Israel, Israel can not afford it.”

I’d been to Landerhaven banquet hall several times. My wife and I had, six years ago, scouted this very room as a possible wedding site. I doubt the room has ever seen the kind of applause that followed.

It wasn’t a standing ovation. It was something else. It rose up – 700 people, an overflow crowd – well past the point when you’d expect it to die down. It hung on, loud, tenacious, like the last notes of Bruce Springsteen’s Born to Run. And then, finally, it ebbed, slightly — only to rise back up again, with shouts behind it, more forceful, insistent.

It was at once a release, an endorsement, and a prayer, and it brought sudden tears to my eyes.

If there was any lingering hesitation — any doubts in the face of viral emails and horrible ads by Jewish Republicans and relentless smears that just keep coming — in that moment, it all seemed to wash away.

The message to Barack Obama was clear:

Win. Win!

Levin: Jews ‘Cannot Tolerate’ Obama Smears

Monday, October 13th, 2008

Sen. Carl Levin of Michigan had a simple but critical message for the largely Jewish audience of 700 that came out for the Obama rally outside Cleveland yesterday.

“The Jewish community of Chicago is totally devoted to the election of Barack Obama,” he said. “This should say something to the Jewish community around the country.”

The Jewish senator also had another point to make, about the relentless smears going around – that Obama is a secret radical Muslim; that he doesn’t pledge allegiance to the flag; that he swears allegiance to anti-Israel advisors; that he pals around with terrorists; that because of his middle name he is not like the rest of us.

“As a people, we more than any other people, cannot tolerate any person or group of people being smeared in this way,” Sen. Levin said.

When he said it, the crowd erupted. The black man in the seat in front of me nearly came out of his seat, cheering.

Levin then noted that many people around the world still believe the Protocol Elders of Zion, the famous forgery that explains how Jews plan to take over the world. People believe that Jews extract the blood of non-Jewish children and use it to make hamentashen cookies.

“The filth we have suffered should instill in us a determination that no one should ever be a victim of this kind of filth,” he said. “And Barack Obama does not deserve to be a victim.”

It was a theme touched on earlier by Congresswoman Jane Harman of California.

“As a Jew, we know what this is,” she said, referring to the McCain-Palin campaign rally slurs of Barack “Hussein” Obama as the un-American other. “And I’ve got news for them: It won’t work.”

The View From Golda’s Balcony

Monday, August 25th, 2008

Driving into downtown Denver today, you could sense the excitement building. I drove past a billboard with a drawing of a red, white, and blue donkey on the left, and a Prius on the right. Beneath the donkey it said: “Delegates: 4,439 Strong.” Beneath the Toyota it said: “Prius: 1,000,000 Strong.” Something tells me the message will find a receptive audience this week.

I was in Denver tonight for a private screening of the film Golda’s Balcony, hosted by the National Jewish Democratic Council (NJDC). The movie was shown at a church, next to the Golda Meir house, on the Auraria Campus downtown. First, some history: Meir was born in Russia and, to avoid pogroms, emigrated to Milwaukee, but after 8th grade, her parents told her should could not go to high school — she would have to work in the family store — so she packed a bag and ran away — to Denver — to live with her sister and brother-in-law. She stayed for two years, attending North High School, meeting Jewish intellectuals, many of whom were in Denver being treated for tuberculosis. It was the start of her Zionist journey. I found two dollars on the sidewalk outside the house, and slipped it in a glass box, near the front, as a donation. The latest CNN poll on Sunday showed the race in a dead heat. Obama-Biden needs all the karma it can get.

There were about 150 people at the screening. I’d seen the play on Broadway, and been extremely moved. The movie, starring Valerie Harper (of “Rhoda” fame), employed some of the same devices: Harper, as Meir, narrating her story directly, speaking to the audience. In the film, still shots flashed behind Meir — images that reinforced the dialouge. (For instance, when Meir spoke about the Holocaust, horrifying images of the camps flashed behind her.) Harper played all parts — including Meir’s husband, and her war cabinet. It was jarring, at first — so different from what we are used to seeing in film. But the story was so compelling, you quickly forgot the devices, and were simply absorbed by the tale.

The most gripping part of the film dramatizes Meir’s handling of the 1973 Yom Kippur War, when Arab armies launched the surprise attack against Israel. Meir is told by Moshe Dayan and other generals, after the first day of fighting, that the Golan front is collapsing — Israel is down to only a few tanks — and they are dangerously short of supplies on the Egyptian front. At some point, Meir recognizes, it’s no longer a question of maintaining hold of the Sinai: Israel is on the verge of crumbling before the Arab onslaught.

She sits in her office, chain-smoking, unable to eat, unable to sleep. The Zionist vision she has been advancing all of her life — a political response to the Holocaust, addressing the need for a safe refuge that would allow the ingathering of Jews from around the world — is slipping away. And Meir, as prime minister, is overseeing its demise. She picks up the phone again and again, pushing her aid to get Henry Kissinger on the line — to tell President Nixon that Israel needs planes and tanks and supplies to fight back. That its very existence is at stake. Kissinger, it seems, was hard to get on the phone.

At this point, Meir begins another narrative. The story of how Israel found uranium in the Negev, and began working to build a nuclear bomb, miles beneath the desert. How Israel told the world it was building a “desalination plant.” And how she stood, on an underground platform high above it all — monitoring the development of nuclear warheads. She was there so often, the technicians started calling it “Golda’s Balcony.”

Now, with the Arab armies advancing, Meir had a choice: arm the fighter jets with the nuclear-tipped weapons, or do nothing, and see Israel and all its Jews forced into the sea. “To save the world you created,” muses Meir, agonizing over her options, “how many worlds are you entilted to destroy?” She makes the decision to arm the planes, and orders her aid to call Kissinger, to tell him: I have authorized our pilots to hit the “Arab military headquarters” — her euphemism for Cairo and Damascus.

I’m sitting there, in this soaring church, and something inside me is churning. Not just because of what happened to Israel 25-years ago, not just because of Meir’s despair, but, I realize, because of a point my father-in-law has made to me, over the course of this campaign. The one thing, he says, that many pro-Israel, Obama-leaning Jews fear about Barack Obama is this: How will he react, at 3 a.m., if he gets the call that Iran has launched a nuclear (or other) attack on Israel? Would he, in that split second, make the decision to use whatever means necessary — military and otherwise — to defend the Jewish state? Obama is a peacemaker, my father-in-law said, a wonderful trait — a trait he shares — but what would that mean, when push came to shove, for the Jewish state in a desperate moment of survival?

In 1973, with the threat of a Mideast nuclear war looming, Kissinger finally sent help. Israel received word that planes, tanks, and munitions were on the way, and unloaded on the Egyptians with everything it had. Ariel Sharon crossed the Suez, out-flanking the Egyptian army from behind. It’s not a stretch to say the state had been saved by her decision. And yet watching this movie, you can see that making the choice nearly killed her. After it was all over, Kissinger told Meir: “You blackmailed me.” Meir responded: “Only blackmail?”

Meir had something in her, something to do with her dedication to her life’s cause, that most of us don’t have. It cost her her marriage, her husband. At one point, with her daughter and grandkids in a kibbutz near the Egyptian border, Meir talks about how she knew there was a chance that war would break out the next morning, and her daughter’s kibbutz would be overrun. She didn’t tell her daughter what she knew, though. When war did break out, her daughter demanded to know why her mother hadn’t warned her of the danger ahead of time. Meir said: “I couldn’t tell everybody — How could I tell you?”

After the movie, Harper — in attendance for the screening — took the stage and received a powerful, extended standing ovation. “Thank you, Denver, for what you did in shaping this magnificent woman, our Golda Meir,” she said.

Following a q-and-a, in a square outside the Golda Meir House, the NJDC hosted an event, honoring Jewish members of Congress. Among those present were Rep. Henry Waxman (Calif.), Rep. Jerrold Nadler (New York), Sen. Carl Levin (Michigan), and Sen. Frank Lautenberg (New Jersey).

“There’s no difference between the candidates on Israel,” Sen. Levin said. “They’re both strong supporters of Israel.” The key to Israel’s security, he said, is to “reach out and pull in allies — and there’s no one better to do that than Barack Obama.”

“Barack Obama is a fine friend of Israel,” said Rep. Nadler. “So is John McCain. So is George Bush, for that matter.” Nadler said, however, that Bush’s policies have made Israel less safe, by empowering Iran. Then, alluding to the movie we had just seen, he said: “The biggest threat to Israel is Iran. And Barack Obama will follow policies that will avoid two years from now having two choices” — as Meir had — “One: Do Nothing; Two: Attack Iran.” The latter choice, he said, would be “catastrophic” for Israel — because Iran would launch 40,000 missiles at Israel from Lebanon. The only way to deal with Iran, he said, is with “very big sticks, and big carrots: If you behave, if you give up your nuclear weapons and … stop funding Hezbollah, we’ll be very nice to you.”

Essentially, the Congressmen were making the case that by restoring America as a respected world leader, building strong coalitions with allies, and confronting Iran with strength — negotiations backed by the threat of military action — it would force Iran to climb down from its nuclear ledge. Obama would succeed where Bush has failed — containing Iran — and thus he would avoid the 3 a.m. pho
ne call that my father-in-law posited.

Standing just a few yards away from the house where Golda Meir’s Zionist path began, I couldn’t help but think that Meir, herself, would put her faith in the peacemaker, ahead of the warrior. Meir, as Golda’s Balcony shows over and over again, had a peacmaker’s mentality. Each and every Jewish soldiers’ death anguished her. But she was equally anguished by the fact that Jewish young men were put in a position where they had to kill.

Inscribed on a plaque, on the wall of the home where Golda once served tea to Jewish intellectuals, is the following quote from Meir: “A leader who doesn’t stutter before he sends his nation into battle, is not fit to be a leader.”

Barack Obama would stutter at 3 a.m. That’s exactly the point.

And that’s why I am voting for him.