<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Neurotic Democrat &#187; G-8</title>
	<atom:link href="http://neuroticdemocrat.com/tag/g-8/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://neuroticdemocrat.com</link>
	<description>&#34;There lives more faith in honest doubt, believe me, than in half the creeds.&#34; - Alfred, Lord Tennyson</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 13 Jan 2012 15:12:44 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>G-8 Tightens Timetable on Iran</title>
		<link>http://neuroticdemocrat.com/2009/07/g-8-tightens-timetable-on-iran/</link>
		<comments>http://neuroticdemocrat.com/2009/07/g-8-tightens-timetable-on-iran/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 10 Jul 2009 18:20:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Neurotic Dem</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Iran]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Jewish Interest]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Obama]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Uncategorized]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[G-8]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Netanyahu]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://neuroticdemocrat.com/?p=867</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Talk about a swing and a miss. Coming out of the G-8 talks in Italy, much of the media seems intent on arguing that the summit didn&#8217;t go far enough on the issue of a nuclear Iran. See, for example, Time: &#8220;The G-8 Speaks Softly on Iran&#8217;s Nuclear Program.&#8221; This completely ignores the fact that [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Talk about a swing and a miss.</p>
<p>Coming out of the G-8 talks in Italy, much of the media seems intent on arguing that the summit didn&#8217;t go far enough on the issue of a nuclear Iran. See, for example, Time: &#8220;<a href="http://www.time.com/time/specials/packages/article/0,28804,1909148_1909157_1909648,00.html">The G-8 Speaks Softly on Iran&#8217;s Nuclear Program</a>.&#8221;</p>
<p>This completely ignores the fact that Russia, which in the past has been the stumbling block to a united front against Iran, signed on to what President Barack Obama today described as &#8220;a strong statement calling on Iran to fulfill its [nuclear non-proliferation] responsibilities without delay.&#8221;</p>
<p>And there seems to be a bigger, more fundamental point that the media is totally missing.</p>
<p>In May, when Israeli Prime Minister Bibi Netanyahu met President Barack Obama in the White House, Obama said that while he would try to engage Iran, he wouldn&#8217;t do it indefinitely, saying the Islamic Republic had until the end of the year to respond on its nuclear program. At the time, the <a href="http://www.nypost.com/seven/05192009/news/nationalnews/bam__bibi_team_up_vs__irans_nukes_169991.htm">New York Post </a>said the two leaders &#8220;agreed an aggressive timetable is needed to deal with Iran&#8217;s nuclear intentions.&#8221;</p>
<p>That timetable just got a whole lot more aggressive. The leaders of the G-8 nations, with Russia&#8217;s assent, said they would &#8220;take stock&#8221; of the situation again at another international meeting in Pittsburgh in just two months.</p>
<p>As Politico <a href="http://www.politico.com/news/stories/0709/24773.html">reported</a>:</p>
<blockquote><p>&#8220;What that does is provides a time frame,&#8221; Obama said. If Iran does not take up offers to resume talks over its nuclear program, &#8220;you have on record the G-8 to begin with [and] potentially a lot of other countries that are going to say you need to take further steps &#8230;&#8221;</p>
<p>Obama said a &#8216;door&#8217; is open to Iran, but he warned that the patience of the world community is finite. &#8220;We&#8217;re not going to just wait indefinitely and allow for the development of nuclear weapons in breach of international treaties and wake up one day and find ourselves in a much worse situation and unable to act.&#8221;</p></blockquote>
<p>As I write this, Haaretz is running an AP article on its homepage headlined: &#8220;<a href="http://www.haaretz.com/hasen/spages/1099290.html">Obama: U.S. Won&#8217;t Allow Iran to Develop Nukes</a>.&#8221;</p>
<p><span class="t13">Here&#8217;s the lead:</span></p>
<blockquote><p><span class="t13">U.S. President Barack Obama said Friday the world would not allow Iran to develop nuclear weapons, a day after a senior Iranian official vowed his country would not back down &#8220;even one step&#8221; over its nuclear work &#8230;</span></p>
<p><span class="t13">&#8220;I think the real story here was consensus in that [G8] statement, including Russia, which doesn&#8217;t make statements like that lightly,&#8221; [Obama] said. &#8220;Now the other story there was the agreement that we will reevaluate Iran&#8217;s posture towards negotiating the cessation of a nuclear weapons policy.&#8221;</span></p>
<p>&#8220;We&#8217;ll evaluate that at the G20 meeting in September.&#8221;</p></blockquote>
<p><span class="t13">Despite what Time says, I imagine the clerical leaders of Iran hear the message loud and clear.</span></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://neuroticdemocrat.com/2009/07/g-8-tightens-timetable-on-iran/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

